Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):784-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 17.

Problem list completeness in electronic health records: A multi-site study and assessment of success factors.

Author information

1
Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: awright5@partners.org.
2
Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, United States.
3
Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
4
Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA, United States.
5
Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
6
Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
7
The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
8
Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
9
Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, United States.
10
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States.
11
Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA, United States.
12
The University of Texas Health Science School of Biomedical Informatics at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To assess problem list completeness using an objective measure across a range of sites, and to identify success factors for problem list completeness.

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic health record data and interviews at ten healthcare organizations within the United States, United Kingdom, and Argentina who use a variety of electronic health record systems: four self-developed and six commercial. At each site, we assessed the proportion of patients who have diabetes recorded on their problem list out of all patients with a hemoglobin A1c elevation>=7.0%, which is diagnostic of diabetes. We then conducted interviews with informatics leaders at the four highest performing sites to determine factors associated with success. Finally, we surveyed all the sites about common practices implemented at the top performing sites to determine whether there was an association between problem list management practices and problem list completeness.

RESULTS:

Problem list completeness across the ten sites ranged from 60.2% to 99.4%, with a mean of 78.2%. Financial incentives, problem-oriented charting, gap reporting, shared responsibility, links to billing codes, and organizational culture were identified as success factors at the four hospitals with problem list completeness at or near 90.0%.

DISCUSSION:

Incomplete problem lists represent a global data integrity problem that could compromise quality of care and put patients at risk. There was a wide range of problem list completeness across the healthcare facilities. Nevertheless, some facilities have achieved high levels of problem list completeness, and it is important to better understand the factors that contribute to success to improve patient safety.

CONCLUSION:

Problem list completeness varies substantially across healthcare facilities. In our review of EHR systems at ten healthcare facilities, we identified six success factors which may be useful for healthcare organizations seeking to improve the quality of their problem list documentation: financial incentives, problem oriented charting, gap reporting, shared responsibility, links to billing codes, and organizational culture.

KEYWORDS:

Diabetes; Electronic health records; Problem lists; Quality

PMID:
26228650
PMCID:
PMC4549158
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.011
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center