Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016 Feb;39(1):38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Jul 27.

Visual performance of single vision and multifocal contact lenses in non-presbyopic myopic eyes.

Author information

1
Brien Holden Vision Institute, Level 4, North Wing, Rupert Myers Building, Gate 14, Barker Street, UNSW, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia.
2
Brien Holden Vision Institute, Level 4, North Wing, Rupert Myers Building, Gate 14, Barker Street, UNSW, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia. Electronic address: r.bakaraju@brienholdenvision.org.
3
Brien Holden Vision Institute, Level 4, North Wing, Rupert Myers Building, Gate 14, Barker Street, UNSW, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia; School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, North Wing, Rupert Myers Building, Gate 14, Barker Street, UNSW, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To assess visual performance of single vision and multifocal soft contact lenses.

METHODS:

At baseline, forty-four myopic participants (aged 18-35 years) were fitted bilaterally with a control lens (AirOptix Aqua). At the four follow-up visits, a total of 16 study lenses (5 single vision, 11 multifocal lenses) were fitted contralaterally. After 1h of lens wear, participants rated (scale 1-10) vision clarity (distance, intermediate and near), magnitude of ghosting at distance, comfort during head movement, and overall comfort. Distance high contrast visual acuity (HCVA), central refraction and higher order aberrations, and contact lens centration were measured.

RESULTS:

For single vision lenses, vision ratings were not significantly different to the control (p>0.005). The control outperformed Acuvue Oasys, Clariti Monthly and Night and Day in HCVA (mean VA: -0.10 ± 0.07 logMAR, p<0.005). Most refraction and higher order aberration measures were not different between lenses. The Night and Day lens showed greatest differences compared to the control, i.e., C[4, 0] was more positive (p<0.005) at distance (Δ=0.019 μm) and near (Δ=0.028 μm). For multifocal lenses, the majority of vision ratings (84%) were better with the control (p<0.005). HCVA was better with the control (p<0.005). Proclear Multifocal lenses showed greatest differences for M, C[3, -1] and C[4, 0] at distance and near, and were inferiorly de-centered (p<0.005).

CONCLUSION:

Design differences between single vision lenses had a small impact on visual performance. Lenses featuring multifocality decreased visual performance, in particular when power variations across the optic zone were large and/or the lens was significantly de-centered.

KEYWORDS:

Multifocal contact lenses; Myopia; Single vision contact lenses; Visual performance

PMID:
26228543
DOI:
10.1016/j.clae.2015.07.005
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center