Format

Send to

Choose Destination
HIV Med. 2016 Mar;17(3):231-4. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12292. Epub 2015 Jul 28.

Late presentation to HIV testing is overestimated when based on the consensus definition.

Author information

1
Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium.
2
Instituut Tropische Geneeskunde Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium.
3
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
4
CHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
5
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
6
Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
7
CHU de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium.
8
CHU de Liège, Liege, Belgium.
9
Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
10
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
11
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
12
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, Ghent, Belgium.
13
Universiteit Gent, Ghent, Belgium.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

In 2011, a consensus was reached defining "late presenters" (LPs) as individuals presenting for care with a CD4 count < 350 cells/μL or with an AIDS-defining event, regardless of CD4 count. However, a transient low CD4 count is not uncommon in recent infections. The objective of this study was to investigate how measurements of late presentation change if the clinical stage at the time of diagnosis is taken into account.

METHODS:

Case surveillance data for newly diagnosed patients in Belgium in 1998-2012 were analysed, including CD4 count at diagnosis, the presence of AIDS-defining events, and recent infections (< 6 months) as reported by clinicians in the case of acute illness or a recent negative test. First, proportions of LPs were calculated according to the consensus definition. Secondly, LPs were reclassified as "nonlate" if infections were reported as recent.

RESULTS:

A total of 7949 HIV diagnoses were included in the study. Recent infections were increasingly reported over time, accounting for 8.2% of new infections in 1998 and 37.5% in 2012. The consideration of clinical stage significantly modified the proportion of LPs: 18.2% of men who have sex with men (MSM) diagnosed in 2012 would be classified as LPs instead of 30.9% using the consensus definition (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients misclassified as LPs increased significantly over time: 5% in MSM in 1998 vs. 41% in 2012.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study suggests that low CD4 counts in recent infections may lead to overestimation of late presentation when applying the consensus definition. The impact of transient CD4 count on late presentation estimates should be assessed and, if relevant, the introduction of clinical stage in the definition of late presentation should be considered.

KEYWORDS:

AIDS; HIV; consensus definition; late diagnosis; late presentation; men who have sex with men; testing

PMID:
26222266
PMCID:
PMC5034831
DOI:
10.1111/hiv.12292
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center