Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct;40(8):3084-90. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0506-9.

Feasibility of and agreement between MR imaging and spectroscopic estimation of hepatic proton density fat fraction in children with known or suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Author information

1
Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
2
Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern School of Medicine, Dallas, TX, USA.
3
Computational and Applied Statistics Laboratory (CASL), San Diego Supercomputing Center (SDSC), University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
4
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
5
Department of Gastroenterology, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
6
Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
7
Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. msm@ucsd.edu.
8
UCSD Department of Radiology, UCSD MRI Institute, 410 West Dickinson Street, San Diego, CA, 92103-8749, USA. msm@ucsd.edu.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To assess feasibility of and agreement between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) for estimating hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) in children with known or suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Children were included in this study from two previous research studies in each of which three MRI and three MRS acquisitions were obtained. Sequence acceptability, and MRI- and MRS-estimated PDFF were evaluated. Agreement of MRI- with MRS-estimated hepatic PDFF was assessed by linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. Age, sex, BMI-Z score, acquisition time, and artifact score effects on MRI- and MRS-estimated PDFF agreement were assessed by multiple linear regression.

RESULTS:

Eighty-six children (61 boys and 25 girls) were included in this study. Slope and intercept from regressing MRS-PDFF on MRI-PDFF were 0.969 and 1.591%, respectively, and the Bland-Altman bias and 95% limits of agreement were 1.17% ± 2.61%. MRI motion artifact score was higher in boys than girls (by 0.21, p = 0.021). Higher BMI-Z score was associated with lower agreement between MRS and MRI (p = 0.045).

CONCLUSION:

Hepatic PDFF estimation by both MRI and MRS is feasible, and MRI- and MRS-estimated PDFF agree closely in children with known or suspected NAFLD.

KEYWORDS:

MRI; MRS; NAFLD; PDFF; Proton density fat fraction; Steatosis

PMID:
26205992
PMCID:
PMC4630122
DOI:
10.1007/s00261-015-0506-9
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center