Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Nov;9(6):641-51. doi: 10.1177/1745691614551642.

Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors.

Author information

1
Department of Statistics and Department of Political Science, Columbia University gelman@stat.columbia.edu.
2
Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Department of Paediatrics and School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne.

Abstract

Statistical power analysis provides the conventional approach to assess error rates when designing a research study. However, power analysis is flawed in that a narrow emphasis on statistical significance is placed as the primary focus of study design. In noisy, small-sample settings, statistically significant results can often be misleading. To help researchers address this problem in the context of their own studies, we recommend design calculations in which (a) the probability of an estimate being in the wrong direction (Type S [sign] error) and (b) the factor by which the magnitude of an effect might be overestimated (Type M [magnitude] error or exaggeration ratio) are estimated. We illustrate with examples from recent published research and discuss the largest challenge in a design calculation: coming up with reasonable estimates of plausible effect sizes based on external information.

KEYWORDS:

Type M error; Type S error; design calculation; exaggeration ratio; power analysis; replication crisis; statistical significance

Comment in

PMID:
26186114
DOI:
10.1177/1745691614551642
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center