Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Healthc (Amst). 2015 Jun;3(2):80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Mar 13.

Methods for engaging stakeholders in comparative effectiveness research: a patient-centered approach to improving diabetes care.

Author information

1
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612, USA. Electronic address: Julie.A.Schmittdiel@kp.org.
2
HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
3
Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Denver, CO, USA.
4
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA.
5
Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
6
Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.

Abstract

Engaging stakeholders in the research process has the potential to improve quality of care and the patient care experience. Online patient community surveys can elicit important topic areas for comparative effectiveness research. Stakeholder meetings with substantial patient representation, as well as representation from health care delivery systems and research funding agencies, are a valuable tool for selecting and refining pilot research and quality improvement projects. Giving patient stakeholders a deciding vote in selecting pilot research topics helps ensure their 'voice' is heard. Researchers and health care leaders should continue to develop best-practices and strategies for increasing patient involvement in comparative effectiveness and delivery science research.

KEYWORDS:

Comparative effectiveness research; Diabetes; Patient engagement; Stakeholder engagement

PMID:
26179728
PMCID:
PMC5100811
DOI:
10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.02.005
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center