Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov 15;192(10):1179-90. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201503-0516OC.

Early High-Volume Hemofiltration versus Standard Care for Post-Cardiac Surgery Shock. The HEROICS Study.

Author information

  • 11 Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit.
  • 22 Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department.
  • 33 Unité de Recherche Clinique, and.
  • 44 Cardiac Surgery Department, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Paris, France.
  • 55 Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, CHU La Timone, Marseille, France.
  • 66 Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, Amiens University Hospital, INSERM U-1088, Université de Picardie Jules-Verne, Amiens, France.
  • 77 Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, CHU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
  • 88 Department d'Anesthésiologie et Réanimation, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France.
  • 99 Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, CHU de Lyon, Lyon, France.
  • 1010 Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
  • 1111 Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinique Jacques Cartier, Massy, France; and.
  • 1212 Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care II, CHU de Bordeaux, and Université de Bordeaux, Adaptation Cardiovasculaire à l'Ischémie, U1034, Pessac, France.

Abstract

RATIONALE:

Post-cardiac surgery shock is associated with high morbidity and mortality. By removing toxins and proinflammatory mediators and correcting metabolic acidosis, high-volume hemofiltration (HVHF) might halt the vicious circle leading to death by improving myocardial performance and reducing vasopressor dependence.

OBJECTIVES:

To determine whether early HVHF decreases all-cause mortality 30 days after randomization.

METHODS:

This prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial included patients with severe shock requiring high-dose catecholamines 3-24 hours post-cardiac surgery who were randomized to early HVHF (80 ml/kg/h for 48 h), followed by standard-volume continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) until resolution of shock and recovery of renal function, or conservative standard care, with delayed CVVHDF only for persistent, severe acute kidney injury.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:

On Day 30, 40 of 112 (36%) HVHF and 40 of 112 (36%) control subjects (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.56; P = 1.00) had died; only 57% of the control subjects had received renal-replacement therapy. Between-group survivors' Day-60, Day-90, intensive care unit, and in-hospital mortality rates, Day-30 ventilator-free days, and renal function recovery were comparable. HVHF patients experienced faster correction of metabolic acidosis and tended to be more rapidly weaned off catecholamines but had more frequent hypophosphatemia, metabolic alkalosis, and thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSIONS:

For patients with post-cardiac surgery shock requiring high-dose catecholamines, the early HVHF onset for 48 hours, followed by standard volume until resolution of shock and recovery of renal function, did not lower Day-30 mortality and did not impact other important patient-centered outcomes compared with a conservative strategy with delayed CVVHDF initiation only for patients with persistent, severe acute kidney injury. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01077349).

KEYWORDS:

cardiac surgery; high-volume hemofiltration; mortality; randomized controlled trial

PMID:
26167637
DOI:
10.1164/rccm.201503-0516OC
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Atypon
    Loading ...
    Support Center