Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015 Nov;115(11):2335-47. doi: 10.1007/s00421-015-3214-9. Epub 2015 Jul 10.

Muscle activation during three sets to failure at 80 vs. 30% 1RM resistance exercise.

Author information

1
Department of Nutrition and Health Sciences, Room 211, Ruth Leverton Hall, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68583-0806, USA.
2
Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, 221 Seaton Building, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506-0219, USA.
3
Department of Nutrition and Health Sciences, Room 211, Ruth Leverton Hall, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68583-0806, USA. jcramer@unl.edu.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study was to investigate electromyographic amplitude (EMG AMP), EMG mean power frequency (MPF), exercise volume (VOL), total work and muscle activation (iEMG), and time under concentric load (TUCL) during, and muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) before and after 3 sets to failure at 80 vs. 30 % 1RM resistance exercise.

METHODS:

Nine men (mean ± SD, age 21.0 ± 2.4 years, resistance training week(-1) 6.0 ± 3.7 h) and 9 women (age 22.8 ± 3.8 years, resistance training week(-1) 3.4 ± 3.5 h) completed 1RM testing, followed by 2 experimental sessions during which they completed 3 sets to failure of leg extension exercise at 80 or 30 % 1RM. EMG signals were collected to quantify EMG AMP and MPF during the initial, middle, and last repetition of each set. Ultrasound was used to assess mCSA pre- and post-exercise, and VOL, total work, iEMG, and TUCL were calculated.

RESULTS:

EMG AMP remained greater at 80 % than 30 % 1RM across all reps and sets, despite increasing 74 and 147 % across reps at 80 and 30 % 1RM, respectively. EMG MPF decreased across reps at 80 and 30 % 1RM, but decreased more and was lower for the last reps at 30 than 80 % 1RM (71.6 vs. 78.1 % MVIC). mCSA increased more from pre- to post-exercise for 30 % (20.2-24.1 cm(2)) than 80 % 1RM (20.3-22.8 cm(2)). VOL, total work, iEMG and TUCL were greater for 30 % than 80 % 1RM.

CONCLUSION:

Muscle activation was greater at 80 % 1RM. However, differences in volume, metabolic byproduct accumulation, and muscle swelling may help explain the unexpected adaptations in hypertrophy vs. strength observed in previous studies.

KEYWORDS:

Electromyography; Exercise volume; Muscle fatigue; Muscle size; Resistance training intensity; Skeletal muscle

PMID:
26159316
DOI:
10.1007/s00421-015-3214-9
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center