Send to

Choose Destination
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Jul;3(4):286-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00079.x.

Replication and p Intervals: p Values Predict the Future Only Vaguely, but Confidence Intervals Do Much Better.

Author information

School of Psychological Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia


Replication is fundamental to science, so statistical analysis should give information about replication. Because p values dominate statistical analysis in psychology, it is important to ask what p says about replication. The answer to this question is "Surprisingly little." In one simulation of 25 repetitions of a typical experiment, p varied from <.001 to .76, thus illustrating that p is a very unreliable measure. This article shows that, if an initial experiment results in two-tailed p = .05, there is an 80% chance the one-tailed p value from a replication will fall in the interval (.00008, .44), a 10% chance that p <.00008, and fully a 10% chance that p >.44. Remarkably, the interval-termed a p interval-is this wide however large the sample size. p is so unreliable and gives such dramatically vague information that it is a poor basis for inference. Confidence intervals, however, give much better information about replication. Researchers should minimize the role of p by using confidence intervals and model-fitting techniques and by adopting meta-analytic thinking.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center