Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Brain Behav Immun. 2015 Nov;50:155-165. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.06.024. Epub 2015 Jun 30.

Mesenchymal stem cells do not exert direct beneficial effects on CNS remyelination in the absence of the peripheral immune system.

Author information

1
Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Germany; Center for Systems Neuroscience, Hannover, Germany.
2
Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Germany.
3
Center for Systems Neuroscience, Hannover, Germany; Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
4
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
5
Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Germany; Center for Systems Neuroscience, Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: stangel.martin@MH-Hannover.de.

Abstract

Remyelination is the natural repair mechanism in demyelinating disorders such as multiple sclerosis (MS) and it was proposed that it might protect from axonal loss. For unknown reasons, remyelination is often incomplete or fails in MS lesions and therapeutic treatments to enhance remyelination are not available. Recently, the transplantation of exogenous mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) has emerged as a promising tool to enhance repair processes. This included the animal model experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a commonly used model for the autoimmune mechanisms of MS. However, in EAE it is not clear if the beneficial effect of MSC derives from a direct influence on brain resident cells or if this is an indirect phenomenon via modulation of the peripheral immune system. The aim of this study was to determine potential regenerative functions of MSC in the toxic cuprizone model of demyelination that allows studying direct effects on de- and remyelination without the influence of the peripheral immune system. MSC from three different species (human, murine, canine) were transplanted either intraventricularly into the cerebrospinal fluid or directly into the lesion of the corpus callosum at two time points: at the onset of oligodendrocyte progenitor cell (OPC) proliferation or the peak of OPC proliferation during cuprizone induced demyelination. Our results show that MSC did not exert any regenerative effects after cuprizone induced demyelination and oligodendrocyte loss. During remyelination, MSC did not influence the dynamics of OPC proliferation and myelin formation. In conclusion, MSC did not exert direct regenerative functions in a mouse model where peripheral immune cells and especially T lymphocytes do not play a role. We thus suggest that the peripheral immune system is required for MSC to exert their effects and this is independent from a direct influence of the central nervous system.

KEYWORDS:

Corpus callosum; Cuprizone; Intraventricular; MS; MSC

PMID:
26140734
DOI:
10.1016/j.bbi.2015.06.024
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center