Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Spine J. 2015 Oct 1;15(10):2222-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.06.047. Epub 2015 Jun 19.

A non-randomized clinical trial to assess the impact of nonrigid, inelastic corsets on spine function in low back pain participants and asymptomatic controls.

Author information

1
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, 8205 114 St, 2-50 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G4. Electronic address: greg.kawchuk@ualberta.ca.
2
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, 8205 114 St, 2-50 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G4.
3
Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Faculty of Science, 632 Central Academic Building University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT:

Although previous studies suggest braces/corsets can reduce acute pain, no prior study has assessed back function after bracing with both self-reported and objective measures. Use of both self-reported and objective measures of spine function together may be important given evidence they assess unique aspects of function.

PURPOSE:

The aim was to assess both self-reported and objective measures of spinal function before, and after, use of a nonrigid, inelastic lumbar brace.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING:

This was a non-randomized clinical trial.

PATIENT SAMPLE:

The sample included acute low back pain (LBP) participants and asymptomatic controls.

OUTCOME MEASURES:

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), spinal stiffness, and muscle endurance were the outcome measures.

METHODS:

Three groups were studied: -LBP/-Brace (n=19), -LBP/+Brace (n=18), and +LBP/+Brace (n=17). Both groups of braced participants were instructed to wear the brace continually for 2 weeks with the exception of bedroom and bathroom activities. Before and after the 2-week period, three measures of spinal function were performed: spinal stiffness via motorized indentation of the L3 spinous process, a modified Sorensen test (timed lumbar extension against gravity), and the ODI. Repeated measures analyses of variance were conducted for all three outcomes.

RESULTS:

Among the groups, ODI scores decreased significantly for the +LBP/+Brace group (p<.001) compared with the other two groups. The +LBP/+Brace mean ODI score decreased 3.71 points (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.01-5.40) compared with the -LBP/-Brace group and decreased 3.48 points (95% CI 1.77-5.20) compared with the -LBP/+Brace group. Change scores for the Sorensen test were significantly increased in the +LBP/+Brace group (p=.037) compared with the -LBP/-Brace group (22.47s 95% CI 8.14-36.80). Spinal stiffness did not change significantly between groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study demonstrates that lumbar function assessed by self-reported and objective measures does not worsen when nonrigid, inelastic bracing is used for short periods of time for those with, or without, back pain. These data add to the existing literature that suggests short-term use of nonrigid, inelastic bracing for acute LBP does not decrease spinal function when measured separately with subjective or objective tools.

KEYWORDS:

Acute low back pain; Bracing; Corset; Endurance; Indentation; Oswestry Disability Index; Sorensen test; Spinal stiffness

PMID:
26101179
DOI:
10.1016/j.spinee.2015.06.047
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center