Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Genomics. 2015 Jun 23;16:474. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1702-2.

Linked genetic variants on chromosome 10 control ear morphology and body mass among dog breeds.

Author information

1
Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. matthew.webster@imbim.uu.se.
2
Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. nkamgari@yahoo.com.
3
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. perloski@broadinstitute.org.
4
Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. marc.hoeppner@imbim.uu.se.
5
Bioinformatics Infrastructure for Life Sciences, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. marc.hoeppner@imbim.uu.se.
6
Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. erik.axelsson@imbim.uu.se.
7
Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. ake.hedhammar@slu.se.
8
Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. gerli.pielberg@imbim.uu.se.
9
Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. kersli@broadinstitute.org.
10
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. kersli@broadinstitute.org.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The domestic dog is a rich resource for mapping the genetic components of phenotypic variation due to its unique population history involving strong artificial selection. Genome-wide association studies have revealed a number of chromosomal regions where genetic variation associates with morphological characters that typify dog breeds. A region on chromosome 10 is among those with the highest levels of genetic differentiation between dog breeds and is associated with body mass and ear morphology, a common motif of animal domestication. We characterised variation in this region to uncover haplotype structure and identify candidate functional variants.

RESULTS:

We first identified SNPs that strongly associate with body mass and ear type by comparing sequence variation in a 3 Mb region between 19 breeds with a variety of phenotypes. We next genotyped a subset of 123 candidate SNPs in 288 samples from 46 breeds to identify the variants most highly associated with phenotype and infer haplotype structure. A cluster of SNPs that associate strongly with the drop ear phenotype is located within a narrow interval downstream of the gene MSRB3, which is involved in human hearing. These SNPs are in strong genetic linkage with another set of variants that correlate with body mass within the gene HMGA2, which affects human height. In addition we find evidence that this region has been under selection during dog domestication, and identify a cluster of SNPs within MSRB3 that are highly differentiated between dogs and wolves.

CONCLUSIONS:

We characterise genetically linked variants that potentially influence ear type and body mass in dog breeds, both key traits that have been modified by selective breeding that may also be important for domestication. The finding that variants on long haplotypes have effects on more than one trait suggests that genetic linkage can be an important determinant of the phenotypic response to selection in domestic animals.

PMID:
26100605
PMCID:
PMC4477608
DOI:
10.1186/s12864-015-1702-2
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center