Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Neuroimage. 2015 Dec;123:253-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.092. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

Multi-level block permutation.

Author information

1
Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: winkler@fmrib.ox.ac.uk.
2
Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
3
Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
4
Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Department of Statistics & Warwick Manufacturing Group, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Abstract

Under weak and reasonable assumptions, mainly that data are exchangeable under the null hypothesis, permutation tests can provide exact control of false positives and allow the use of various non-standard statistics. There are, however, various common examples in which global exchangeability can be violated, including paired tests, tests that involve repeated measurements, tests in which subjects are relatives (members of pedigrees) - any dataset with known dependence among observations. In these cases, some permutations, if performed, would create data that would not possess the original dependence structure, and thus, should not be used to construct the reference (null) distribution. To allow permutation inference in such cases, we test the null hypothesis using only a subset of all otherwise possible permutations, i.e., using only the rearrangements of the data that respect exchangeability, thus retaining the original joint distribution unaltered. In a previous study, we defined exchangeability for blocks of data, as opposed to each datum individually, then allowing permutations to happen within block, or the blocks as a whole to be permuted. Here we extend that notion to allow blocks to be nested, in a hierarchical, multi-level definition. We do not explicitly model the degree of dependence between observations, only the lack of independence; the dependence is implicitly accounted for by the hierarchy and by the permutation scheme. The strategy is compatible with heteroscedasticity and variance groups, and can be used with permutations, sign flippings, or both combined. We evaluate the method for various dependence structures, apply it to real data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) as an example application, show that false positives can be avoided in such cases, and provide a software implementation of the proposed approach.

KEYWORDS:

General linear model; Multiple regression; Permutation inference; Repeated measurements

PMID:
26074200
PMCID:
PMC4644991
DOI:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.092
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center