Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Jun;33(6):587. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3257.

Response to cardiac regeneration validated.

Author information

1
1] Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. [2] Center for Cardiovascular Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. [3] Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
2
1] McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. [2] Centre for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. [3] Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. [4] Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
3
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.
4
1] Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. [2] National Institutes of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
5
1] Center for Cardiovascular Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. [2] Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. [3] Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. [4] Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. [5] Department of Medicine/Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Comment on

PMID:
26057970
DOI:
10.1038/nbt.3257
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group
Loading ...
Support Center