Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 May-Jun;32(3):220-4. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000483.

Incision and Curettage Versus Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Chalazia: A Meta-Analysis.

Author information

1
*Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; and †Department of Ophthalmology, The Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To compare the efficacy of the chalazia treatment modalities of incision and curettage (I&C) and intralesional steroid injections (SI).

METHODS:

Full publications of randomized controlled trials that compared I&C with SI were identified. Aggregated success rate, weighted summary proportions, and weighted pooled relative risk for success were calculated for each method.

RESULTS:

Data were extracted from 8 publications that met these criteria, between 1984 and 2013. There were 288 patients treated by SI with aggregate success rate of 60.4% with 1 injection and 72.5% with 1 or 2 injections. The range of the success rate was 8.7 to 86.7% for 1 injection. The success rate for the second SI was 19.0%, with a range of 0% to 53.8%. There were 264 patients treated by I&C with a larger aggregate success rate of 78.0% with 1 procedure and 86.7% with 1 or 2 procedures (p < 0.05 for both comparisons). The range of the success rates was 60.0% to 92.0% for 1 I&C. The success rate for the second I&C was 90.65%, with a range of 83.3% to 100%. Compared with I&C, the overall relative risk for SI with 1 procedure was 0.77 (p = 0.05), while the overall relative risk for 1 or 2 procedures was 0.89 (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS:

This analysis shows that I&C is more effective than SI with 1 procedure. This benefit is reduced when comparing 1 or 2 attempts of I&C and SI. Studies failed to show a difference in the incidence of complications with either procedure.

PMID:
26035035
DOI:
10.1097/IOP.0000000000000483
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center