Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;22(6):757-64. doi: 10.1111/acem.12695. Epub 2015 May 25.

Consensus statement on advancing research in emergency department operations and its impact on patient care.

Author information

1
Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
2
Department of Emergency Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ.
3
Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
4
Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
5
Department of Emergency Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH.
6
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Abstract

The consensus conference on "Advancing Research in Emergency Department (ED) Operations and Its Impact on Patient Care," hosted by The ED Operations Study Group (EDOSG), convened to craft a framework for future investigations in this important but understudied area. The EDOSG is a research consortium dedicated to promoting evidence-based clinical practice in emergency medicine. The consensus process format was a modified version of the NIH Model for Consensus Conference Development. Recommendations provide an action plan for how to improve ED operations study design, create a facilitating research environment, identify data measures of value for process and outcomes research, and disseminate new knowledge in this area. Specifically, we call for eight key initiatives: 1) the development of universal measures for ED patient care processes; 2) attention to patient outcomes, in addition to process efficiency and best practice compliance; 3) the promotion of multisite clinical operations studies to create more generalizable knowledge; 4) encouraging the use of mixed methods to understand the social community and human behavior factors that influence ED operations; 5) the creation of robust ED operations research registries to drive stronger evidence-based research; 6) prioritizing key clinical questions with the input of patients, clinicians, medical leadership, emergency medicine organizations, payers, and other government stakeholders; 7) more consistently defining the functional components of the ED care system, including observation units, fast tracks, waiting rooms, laboratories, and radiology subunits; and 8) maximizing multidisciplinary knowledge dissemination via emergency medicine, public health, general medicine, operations research, and nontraditional publications.

Comment in

PMID:
26014365
PMCID:
PMC4724862
DOI:
10.1111/acem.12695
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center