Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Mar Genomics. 2015 Oct;23:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.margen.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 May 19.

Meiofaunal community analysis by high-throughput sequencing: comparison of extraction, quality filtering, and clustering methods.

Author information

1
Department of Biological Sciences and Molette Biology Laboratory for Environmental and Climate Change Studies, 101 Rouse Life Sciences Building, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA. Electronic address: pmb0010@auburn.edu.
2
Department of Biological Sciences and Molette Biology Laboratory for Environmental and Climate Change Studies, 101 Rouse Life Sciences Building, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA. Electronic address: ken@auburn.edu.

Abstract

Using molecular tools to examine community composition of meiofauna, animals 45μm to 1mm in size living between sediment grains in aquatic environments, is relatively new in comparison to bacterial and archaeal microbial studies. Although high-throughput molecular approaches are starting to be applied to these ccommunities, effectiveness of different approaches for nucleic acid extraction from meiofauna is poorly known and bioinformatic pipelines vary between studies. Given this situation, there is a need for protocols to be developed that promote consistency in sample collection and processing, sequence quality filtering, and Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) clustering methods. Herein, we assess different approaches used for DNA extraction (DNA extracted directly from sediment versus elutriated material retained on a 45μm sieve) as well as how different quality filtering methods of sequences and OTU clustering algorithms impact genetic assessment of meiofauna community composition. DNA extracted directly from sediment resulted in higher presence of non-metazoan eukaryotic taxa; in contrast, an elutriation (resuspension with decanting) approach increased meiofauna abundance and enriched metazoan OTUs. In regards to bioinformatics analyses, the number of overall OTUs varied by clustering algorithm, primarily due to the applied method of sequence quality filtering. However, alpha and beta diversity analyses showed similar trends regardless of bioinformatics pipeline utilized. Based on our results, we recommend studies of meiofauna communities first elutriate samples prior to DNA extraction and include multiple biological replicates to account for variation in community-level composition. The quality filtering method should be carefully considered as this step accounted for large discrepancy in the number of OTUs inferred.

KEYWORDS:

Eukaryote; Illumina; Meiofauna; Metabarcoding; V9; clustering

PMID:
26001512
DOI:
10.1016/j.margen.2015.05.007
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center