Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Health Popul Nutr. 2015 Mar;33(1):123-36.

Neglected value of small population-based surveys: a comparison with demographic and health survey data.

Author information

1
International Rescue Committee, New York, NY, USA.
2
ICF International, Washington, DC, USA.
3
ICF International, Center for Design and Research in Sustainable Health and Human Development (CEDARS), Rockville, MD, USA.

Abstract

We believe that global health practice and evaluation operate with misleading assumptions about lack of reliability of small population-based health surveys (district level and below), leading managers and decision-makers to under-use this valuable information and programmatic tool and to rely on health information from large national surveys when neither timing nor available data meet their needs. This paper uses a unique opportunity for comparison between a knowledge, practice, and coverage (KPC) household survey and Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey (RDHS) carried out in overlapping timeframes to disprove these enduring suspicions. Our analysis shows that the KPC provides coverage estimates consistent with the RDHS estimates for the same geographic areas. We discuss cases of divergence between estimates. Application of the Lives Saved Tool to the KPC results also yields child mortality estimates comparable with DHS-measured mortality. We draw three main lessons from the study and conclude with recommendations for challenging unfounded assumptions against the value of small household coverage surveys, which can be a key resource in the arsenal of local health programmers.

KEYWORDS:

Child health; Methodology; Mortality; Survey

PMID:
25995729
PMCID:
PMC4438656
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center