Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jul;19(6):1181-92. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1478-4. Epub 2015 May 19.

Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Author information

1
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz Medical Center, Augustusplatz 2, 55131, Mainz, Germany, moritz.foersch@unimedizin-mainz.de.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

Class III therapy using a face mask is a common approach for treatment of a deficient maxilla and reverse overbite. Usually, maxillary protraction is combined with transverse palatal expansion using intraoral appliances. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the effectiveness of face mask therapy in combination with concepts of palatal expansion and compression.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to identify studies that address class III treatment using a face mask. The search was carried out using common electronic databases as well as hand search. Both screening and study eligibility analysis were performed with consideration of PRISMA and Cochrane Guidelines for systematic reviews. Several terms describing class III face mask treatment were searched. Particular attention was paid to new strategies of enhancing maxillary protraction.

RESULTS:

The initial search identified 2048 studies. After a thorough selection process, a total of 22 articles met the inclusion criteria. After assessment of the individual quality scoring of each article, eight studies were provided for meta-analysis of the cephalometric parameters. The statistical analysis of treatment changes advocates a positive influence on sagittal maxillary development, which is not primarily influenced by transverse expansion. Dental side effects are more distinct when no expansion was carried out. For the concept of alternating activation/deactivation of the expansion appliance (alt-RAMEC), two articles of high methodological scoring were identified. They indicate an enhancement of face mask treatment.

CONCLUSIONS:

The findings are consistent with results of previous literature studies regarding the efficiency of class III face mask treatment. A further need for more randomized controlled studies was identified especially with regard to the new concept of alternating maxillary expansion and compression, which showed a positive influence on the maxillary protraction based on two studies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE:

Class III therapy using extraoral face mask anchorage is effective for maxillary protraction. The recently discussed new protocols potentially improve this treatment.

PMID:
25982454
DOI:
10.1007/s00784-015-1478-4
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center