Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Jul;43:60-2. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 May 12.

Empirically derived criteria cast doubt on the clinical significance of antidepressant-placebo differences.

Author information

1
University College London, Division of Psychiatry, Maple House, 149, Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK. Electronic address: j.moncrieff@ucl.ac.uk.
2
Harvard Medical School, Program in Placebo Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, United States. Electronic address: irvkirsch@gmail.com.

Abstract

Meta-analyses indicate that antidepressants are superior to placebos in statistical terms, but the clinical relevance of the differences has not been established. Previous suggestions of clinically relevant effect sizes have not been supported by empirical evidence. In the current paper we apply an empirical method that consists of comparing scores obtained on the Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAM-D) and scores from the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. This method reveals that a HAM-D difference of 3 points is undetectable by clinicians using the CGI-I scale. A difference of 7 points on the HAM-D, or an effect size of 0.875, is required to correspond to a rating of 'minimal improvement' on the CGI-I. By these criteria differences between antidepressants and placebo in randomised controlled trials, including trials conducted with people diagnosed with very severe depression, are not detectable by clinicians and fall far short of levels consistent with clinically observable minimal levels of improvement. Clinical significance should be considered alongside statistical significance when making decisions about the approval and use of medications like antidepressants.

KEYWORDS:

Antidepressant efficacy; Clinical relevance of antidepressant effects; Effect size in depression; Hamilton rating scale for depression; Measurement of depression

Comment in

PMID:
25979317
DOI:
10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.005
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center