Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Clin Transl Med. 2015 Apr 21;4:16. doi: 10.1186/s40169-015-0057-2. eCollection 2015.

Utility of five commonly used immunohistochemical markers TTF-1, Napsin A, CK7, CK5/6 and P63 in primary and metastatic adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: a retrospective study of 246 fine needle aspiration cases.

Author information

1
The Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA.
2
The Department of Pathology and Division of Cytopathology, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL 60637 USA.
3
The Department of Chemistry, Magdalen College,, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 4 AU UK.
4
The Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA ; Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21224 USA.
5
The Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy plays a critical role in the diagnosis and staging of lung primary and metastatic lung carcinoma. Accurate subclassification of adenocarcinoma (ADC) and/or squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) is crucial for the targeted therapy. However, the distinction between ADC and SqCC may be difficult in small FNA specimens. Here, we have retrospectively evaluated the utility of TTF-1, Napsin A, CK7, P63 and CK5/6 immunohistochemical (IHC) markers in the distinguishing and subclassification of ADC and SqCC.

METHODS:

A total of 246 FNA cases were identified by a computer search over a two-year period, including 102 primary NSCLC and 144 primary NSCLC which had metastasized to other sites. The immunostaining patterns of TTF-1, Napsin A, CK7, P63 and CK5/6 were correlated with the histological diagnosis of the tumor.

RESULTS:

In 72 primary ADCs, TTF-1, Napsin A and CK7 showed a sensitivity and specificity of 84.5%/96.4%, 92.0%/100%, and 93.8%/50.0%. In 30 primary SqCCs, CK5/6 and P63 showed a sensitivity and specificity of 100%/77.8% and 91.7%/78.3%. In 131 metastatic ADCs, Napsin A showed the highest specificity (100%), versus TTF-1 (87.5%) and CK7 (25%) but decreased sensitivity (67.8% versus 86.9% and 100%); whereas in 13 metastatic SqCCs, CK5/6 and P63 showed a sensitivity/specificity of 100%/84.6% and 100%/68.4%. Bootstrap analysis showed that the combination of TTF-1/CK7, TTF-1/Napsin A and TTF-1/CK7/Napsin A had a sensitivity/specificity of 0.960/0.732, 0.858/0.934, 0.972/0.733 for primary lung ADCs and 0.992/0.642, 0.878/0.881, 0.993/0.618 for metastatic lung ADCs.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study demonstrated that IHC markers had variable sensitivity and specificity in the subclassification of primary and metastatic ADC and SqCC. Based on morphological findings, an algorithm with the combination use of markers aided in the subclassification of NSCLCs in difficult cases.

KEYWORDS:

CK7; Cytopathology; Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology; Immunohistochemical (IHC) marker; Napsin A; Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC); P63 and CK5/6; TTF-1

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center