Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMJ Open. 2015 May 6;5(5):e007553. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007553.

Are two youth-focused interventions sufficient to empower youth with chronic health conditions in their transition to adult healthcare: a mixed-methods longitudinal prospective cohort study.

Author information

1
CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
2
School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
3
Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
4
Children's Developmental Rehabilitation Program, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
5
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

To assess use, utility and impact of transition interventions designed to support and empower self-management in youth with chronic health conditions during transition into adult healthcare.

DESIGN:

A 4-year mixed-method prospective cohort study.

SETTING:

2 academic paediatric hospitals (13 clinics) in Canada.

PARTICIPANTS:

50 adolescents (42% male; mean age 17.9±0.9 years; 20 underlying diagnoses) with transfer to adult care planned within 1 year.

INTERVENTIONS:

The Youth KIT (an organisational tool that includes goal setting activities); an online transition mentor.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

Frequency of use, utility and impact of the transition interventions; goal achievement; post-transfer qualitative interviews with youth.

RESULTS:

50 participants were enrolled during their last year of paediatric care; 36 (72%) were followed into adult care. All participants had access to the transition interventions from enrolment until the end of the study (exposure time: 12-47 months). Most youth (85%) reported using the medical/health section of the Youth KIT at least once; 20 (40%) participants engaged in chats with the mentor. The overall perceived utility of both interventions was modest; the Youth KIT received the highest ratings for 'help with goal setting': (mean (SD): 4.2 (2.3)) on a 7-point Likert scale. 45 (90%) participants set 294 transition goals. Goal achievement performance and satisfaction increased over time (p≤0.001). The qualitative evidence revealed reasons behind the variability in use and utility of the interventions, the interconnectedness of life-course and healthcare transitions, and the need for stronger partnerships between paediatric and adult healthcare systems.

CONCLUSIONS:

Participants' perceptions about the utility of the Youth KIT and the online mentor were modest. Transition supports need to be carefully tailored, timed and integrated into healthcare systems. Individualised goal setting may be an important 'active ingredient' in optimising transition supports and outcomes. Interventions that focus on youth only are insufficient for empowering self-management.

KEYWORDS:

Chronic conditions; Disabilities; Longitudinal research; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; Transition into adult heathcare

PMID:
25948409
PMCID:
PMC4431136
DOI:
10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007553
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center