Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Sep;76:220-39. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.015. Epub 2015 Apr 28.

Disorders of representation and control in semantic cognition: Effects of familiarity, typicality, and specificity.

Author information

1
MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA. Electronic address: ttrogers@wisc.edu.
2
MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, UK.
3
Department of Psychology, University of York, UK.
4
Neuroscience and Aphasia Research Unit, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.

Abstract

We present a case-series comparison of patients with cross-modal semantic impairments consequent on either (a) bilateral anterior temporal lobe atrophy in semantic dementia (SD) or (b) left-hemisphere fronto-parietal and/or posterior temporal stroke in semantic aphasia (SA). Both groups were assessed on a new test battery designed to measure how performance is influenced by concept familiarity, typicality and specificity. In line with previous findings, performance in SD was strongly modulated by all of these factors, with better performance for more familiar items (regardless of typicality), for more typical items (regardless of familiarity) and for tasks that did not require very specific classification, consistent with the gradual degradation of conceptual knowledge in SD. The SA group showed significant impairments on all tasks but their sensitivity to familiarity, typicality and specificity was more variable and governed by task-specific effects of these factors on controlled semantic processing. The results are discussed with reference to theories about the complementary roles of representation and manipulation of semantic knowledge.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center