Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Apr 18;15:32. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0159-1.

Conditions potentially sensitive to a personal health record (PHR) intervention, a systematic review.

Author information

1
Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada. morgan@leadlab.ca.
2
Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C., Canada. morgan@leadlab.ca.
3
Department of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C., Canada. morgan@leadlab.ca.
4
Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C., Canada.
5
Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
6
Department of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C., Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Personal Health Records (PHRs) are electronic health records controlled, shared or maintained by patients to support patient centered care. The potential for PHRs to transform health care is significant; however, PHRs do not always achieve their potential. One reason for this may be that not all health conditions are sensitive to the PHR as an intervention. The goal of this review was to discover which conditions were potentially sensitive to the PHR as an intervention, that is, what conditions have empirical evidence of benefit from PHR-enabled management.

METHODS:

A systematic review of Medline and CINAHL was completed to find articles assessing PHR use and benefit from 2008 to 2014 in specific health conditions. Two researchers independently screened and coded articles. Health conditions with evidence of benefit from PHR use were identified from the included studies.

RESULTS:

23 papers were included. Seven papers were RCTs. Ten health conditions were identified, seven of which had documented benefit associated with PHR use: asthma, diabetes, fertility, glaucoma, HIV, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Reported benefits were seen in terms of care quality, access, and productivity, although many benefits were measured by self-report through quasi-experimental studies. No study examined morbidity/mortality. No study reported harm from the PHR.

CONCLUSION:

There is a small body of condition specific evidence that has been published. Conditions with evidence of benefit when using PHRs tended to be chronic conditions with a feedback loop between monitoring in the PHR and direct behaviours that could be self-managed. These findings can point to other potentially PHR sensitive health conditions and guide PHR designers, implementers, and researchers. More research is needed to link PHR design, features, adoption and health outcomes to better understand how and if PHRs are making a difference to health outcomes.

PMID:
25927384
PMCID:
PMC4411701
DOI:
10.1186/s12911-015-0159-1
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center