Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015 Jul;50(7):655-64. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23190. Epub 2015 Apr 23.

Five years of experience with biochemical cystic fibrosis newborn screening based on IRT/PAP in Germany.

Author information

1
Division of Pediatric Pulmonology & Allergy and Cystic Fibrosis Center, Department of Pediatrics III, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 430, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
2
Translational Lung Research Center TLRC, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Im Neuenheimer Feld 350, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
3
Pediatric Department, University Hospital of Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, D-01307, Dresden, Germany.
4
Department of Paediatrics, Children's Hospital, University of Frankfurt, Haus 32 A, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
5
Division of Metabolic Diseases and Newborn Screening Center, Department of Paediatrics I, Children's Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 430, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
6
Institut of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital of Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany.
7
Department of Translational Pulmonology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 350, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Evidence from recent studies suggests that IRT/PAP protocols may be successfully used as a purely biochemical newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) that does not require genetic screening. However, the experience with the performance of different IRT/PAP protocols remains limited. In this study, we evaluated the performance of IRT/PAP-based CF-NBS used in two German regions between 2008 and 2013 in a large cohort.

METHODS:

In both regions slightly different IRT/PAP protocols were used to screen newborns for CF. In contrast to the original IRT/PAP protocol published by Sarles et al., both German protocols contained an IRT-dependent safety net strategy (CF-NBS positive, if IRT≥99.9th percentile). Positive rating of the screening result led to confirmatory diagnostics using sweat chloride testing and clinical assessment.

FINDINGS:

A total of 328,181 newborns were tested with IRT/PAP in Germany within 5 years. 639 of these newborns (0.19%) were tested positive, and 60 infants were diagnosed with CF leading to a sensitivity of 0.968 and a PPV (positive predictive value) of 0.097. Compared to IRT/DNA protocols, the PPV of IRT/PAP is lower, but PAP used as second tier test has the advantage of a lower detection rate of healthy carriers and CF patients with equivocal results.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results obtained in a large cohort of ∼330,000 newborns support the use of a purely biochemical IRT/PAP protocol as an acceptable alternative when genetic CF-NBS has to be avoided.

KEYWORDS:

Cystic fibrosis; biochemical screening; immunoreactive trypsinogen; newborn screening; pancreatitis associated protein

PMID:
25914230
DOI:
10.1002/ppul.23190
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center