Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Nurs Crit Care. 2017 May;22(3):141-149. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12180. Epub 2015 Apr 24.

Sedation scoring and managing abilities of intensive care nurses post educational intervention.

Author information

1
Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
2
Intensive Care Unit, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
3
Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, 50603 University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
4
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, 50603, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
5
Institute of Educational Leadership & Unit for the Enhancement of Academic Performance (ULPA), 50603, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Inappropriate sedation assessment can jeopardize patient comfort and safety. Therefore, nurses' abilities in assessing and managing sedation are vital for effective care of mechanically ventilated patients.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES:

This study assessed nurses' sedation scoring and management abilities as primary outcomes following educational interventions. Nurses' perceived self-confidence and barriers to effective sedation management were assessed as secondary outcomes.

DESIGN:

A post-test-only quasi-experimental design was used. Data were collected at 3 and 9 months post-intervention.

METHODS:

A total of 66 nurses from a 14-bed intensive care unit of a Malaysian teaching hospital participated. The educational interventions included theoretical sessions, hands-on sedation assessment practice using the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, and a brief sedation assessment tool. Nurses' sedation scoring and management abilities and perceived self-confidence level were assessed at both time points using self-administered questionnaires with case scenarios. Sedation assessment and management barriers were assessed once at 9 months post-intervention.

RESULTS:

Median scores for overall accurate sedation scoring (9 months: 4·00; 3 months: 2·00, p = 0·0001) and overall sedation management (9 months: 14·0; 3 months: 7·0, p = 0·0001) were significantly higher at 9 months compared to 3 months post-intervention. There were no significant differences in the perceived self-confidence level for rating sedation level. Overall perceived barrier scores were low (M = 27·78, SD = 6·26, possible range = 11·0-55·0). Patient conditions (M = 3·68, SD = 1·13) and nurses' workload (M = 3·54, SD = 0·95) were the greatest barriers to effective sedation assessment and management. Demographic variables did not affect sedation scoring or management abilities.

CONCLUSIONS:

Positive changes in nurses' sedation assessment and management abilities were observed, indicating that adequate hands-on clinical practice following educational interventions can improve nurses' knowledge and skills.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE:

Educational initiatives are necessary to improve ICU practice, particularly in ICUs with inexperienced nurses.

KEYWORDS:

Case scenario assessment; Clinical decision-making; Intensive care nurses; Perceived barriers; Sedation assessment and management

PMID:
25913373
DOI:
10.1111/nicc.12180

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center