Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2015 Jan-Feb;61(1):65-71. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.61.01.065. Epub 2015 Jan 1.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of renal and ureteral stones.

Author information

1
Hospital das Clínicas, Medical School's, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
2
HC, FM, USP, Brazil.

Abstract

The use of certain technical principles and the selection of favorable cases can optimize the results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). The aim of this study is to review how ESWL works, its indications and contraindications, predictive factors for success, and its complications. A search was conducted on the Pubmed® database between January 1984 and October 2013 using "shock wave lithotripsy" and "stone" as key-words. Only articles with a high level of evidence, in English, and conducted in humans, such as clinical trials or review/meta-analysis, were included. To optimize the search for the ESWL results, several technical factors including type of lithotripsy device, energy and frequency of pulses, coupling of the patient to the lithotriptor, location of the calculus, and type of anesthesia should be taken into consideration. Other factors related to the patient, stone size and density, skin to stone distance, anatomy of the excretory path, and kidney anomalies are also important. Antibiotic prophylaxis is not necessary, and routine double J stent placement before the procedure is not routinely recommended. Alpha-blockers, particularly tamsulosin, are useful for stones >10mm. Minor complications may occur following ESWL, which generally respond well to clinical interventions. The relationship between ESWL and hypertension/diabetes is not well established.

PMID:
25909212
DOI:
10.1590/1806-9282.61.01.065
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Scientific Electronic Library Online
Loading ...
Support Center