Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Dermatol Surg. 2015 May;41(5):579-86. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000369.

Five-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing high ligation combined with endovenous laser ablation and stripping of the great saphenous vein.

Author information

1
*Department of Surgery, BHS Hospital, Ried im Innkreis, Austria; †Department of Surgery, Elisabethinen Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria; ‡Department of Surgery, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Grieskirchen, Austria.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To report 5-year follow-up data of a randomized study comparing high ligation and stripping (HL + S) with high ligation and endovenous laser ablation (HL + EVLA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV).

METHODS:

One hundred patients were randomized. After 5 years, patient satisfaction with the overall result, CEAP-C class, VCSS, CIVIQ2 quality of life score, and recurrence rate were assessed (clinical examination and duplex ultrasound).

RESULTS:

Five-year follow-up rates were 83% HL + S and 68% HL + EVLA. Patient satisfaction with the overall result was rated good or very good by 88% after HL + S and 87% after HL + EVLA. There were significant improvements for both groups in CEAP-C class (HL + S 2.28 vs. 1.19; HL + EVLA 2.3 vs. 1.17), VCSS (HL + S 4.79 vs. 1.81; HL + EVLA 4.13 vs. 1.87), and CIVIQ2 score (HL + S 82 vs. 94; HL + EVLA 75 vs. 93) (p < .001). There was no difference in recurrence rates on clinical examination and duplex ultrasound (HL + S 55% vs. HL + EVLA 40%; p = .217). A reopened or residual incompetent GSV-partial or complete-was found in 24% (HL + S) and 40% (HL + EVLA), respectively (p = .141).

CONCLUSION:

Varicose vein surgery is followed by favorable clinical results and high patient satisfaction, with no difference between HL + S and HL + EVLA.

PMID:
25899888
DOI:
10.1097/DSS.0000000000000369
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center