Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22(13):4280-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4570-8. Epub 2015 Apr 18.

Surgical Options and Locoregional Recurrence in Patients Diagnosed with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast.

Author information

1
Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. yasuaki@sagara.or.jp.
2
Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
3
Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
4
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
5
Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
6
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. ometzger@partners.org.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Recent consensus guidelines on margins for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) recommend the use of "no ink on tumor" as the standard for an adequate margin. The recommendations extend to invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), but the data on this subset are limited. We reviewed our modern dataset on margin status with outcomes of ILC.

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective cohort study on 736 patients with a diagnosis of stage I-III ILC treated at our cancer center between May 1997 and December 2007. Clinicopathologic data were extracted from the Clinical Research Information Systems Database. Margin status was defined using the latest ASCO/ASTRO/SSO consensus guideline criteria.

RESULTS:

The initial surgery performed was mastectomy in 352 patients (48 %) and BCS in 384 patients (52 %). In multivariate analysis, tumor size and multifocality were significantly associated with high rates of mastectomy and positive surgical margins at initial BCS. After initial BCS, additional surgery was performed in 92 patients (24 %). During a 72-month median follow-up period, 12 (3.1 %) ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences (IBTR) and 5 (1.3 %) other locoregional recurrences (LRR) were observed. Patients with margins with ink on tumor who did not receive further surgery were found to have significantly increased LRR [odds ratio (OR) 5.5; p = 0.02] and IBTR (OR 8.5; p = 0.006), whereas patients with close margins (1-3 mm) and margins within 1 mm were not.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study supports the validity of using "no ink on tumor" as the standard for a negative margin for pure and mixed ILC treated with multimodality therapy.

PMID:
25893416
PMCID:
PMC4801503
DOI:
10.1245/s10434-015-4570-8
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center