Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Pulm Med. 2015 Mar 25;15:26. doi: 10.1186/s12890-015-0022-2.

Evaluation of the global lung function initiative 2012 reference values for spirometry in a Swedish population sample.

Author information

1
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, the OLIN unit, Umeå university, Umeå, Sweden. helena.backman@nll.se.
2
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Division of Medicine, the OLIN unit, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. anne.lindberg@algmed.se.
3
Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, HUS Medical Imaging Centre, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. anssi.sovijarvi@hus.fi.
4
Division of Physiology, the National Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. kjell.larsson@ki.se.
5
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, the OLIN unit, Umeå university, Umeå, Sweden. bo.lundback@gu.se.
6
Krefting Research Centre, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. bo.lundback@gu.se.
7
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, the OLIN unit, Umeå university, Umeå, Sweden. eva.ronmark@nll.se.
8
OLIN-Studierna, Robertsviksgatan 9, 97189, Lulea, Sweden. eva.ronmark@nll.se.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The Global Lung Function Initiative 2012 (GLI) reference values are currently endorsed by several respiratory societies but evaluations of applicability for adults resident in European countries are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the GLI reference values are appropriate for an adult Caucasian Swedish population.

METHODS:

During 2008-2013, clinical examinations including spirometry were performed on general population samples in northern Sweden, in which 501 healthy Caucasian non-smokers were identified. Predicted GLI reference values and Z-scores were calculated for each healthy non-smoking subject and the distributions and mean values for FEV1, FVC and the FEV1/FVC ratio were examined. The prevalence of airway obstruction among these healthy non-smokers was calculated based on the Lower Limit of normal (LLN) criterion (lower fifth percentile) for the FEV1/FVC ratio. Thus, by definition, a prevalence of 5% was expected.

RESULTS:

The Z-scores for FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC were reasonably, although not perfectly, normally distributed, but not centred on zero. Both predicted FEV1 and, in particular, FVC were lower compared to the observed values in the sample. The deviations were greater among women compared to men. The prevalence of airway obstruction based on the LLN criterion for the FEV1/FVC ratio was 9.4% among women and 2.7% among men.

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of the GLI reference values may produce biased prevalence estimates of airway obstruction in Sweden, especially among women. These results demonstrate the importance of validating the GLI reference values in different countries.

PMID:
25887050
PMCID:
PMC4417328
DOI:
10.1186/s12890-015-0022-2
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center