Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Science. 2015 May 22;348(6237):903-6. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa0491. Epub 2015 Apr 16.

Sanitation subsidies. Encouraging sanitation investment in the developing world: a cluster-randomized trial.

Author information

1
Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
2
School of Management, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
3
School of Management, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. ahmed.mobarak@yale.edu.

Abstract

Poor sanitation contributes to morbidity and mortality in the developing world, but there is disagreement on what policies can increase sanitation coverage. To measure the effects of alternative policies on investment in hygienic latrines, we assigned 380 communities in rural Bangladesh to different marketing treatments-community motivation and information; subsidies; a supply-side market access intervention; and a control-in a cluster-randomized trial. Community motivation alone did not increase hygienic latrine ownership (+1.6 percentage points, P = 0.43), nor did the supply-side intervention (+0.3 percentage points, P = 0.90). Subsidies to the majority of the landless poor increased ownership among subsidized households (+22.0 percentage points, P < 0.001) and their unsubsidized neighbors (+8.5 percentage points, P = 0.001), which suggests that investment decisions are interlinked across neighbors. Subsidies also reduced open defecation by 14 percentage points (P < 0.001).

PMID:
25883316
DOI:
10.1126/science.aaa0491
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire
Loading ...
Support Center