Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Clin Pathol. 2015 May;143(5):623-6. doi: 10.1309/AJCPJOJ3HKEBD3TU.

Reducing duplicate testing: a comparison of two clinical decision support tools.

Author information

1
From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. procopg@ccf.org.
2
From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

Unnecessary duplicate laboratory testing is common and costly. Systems-based means to avert unnecessary testing should be investigated and employed.

METHODS:

We compared the effectiveness and cost savings associated with two clinical decision support tools to stop duplicate testing. The Hard Stop required telephone contact with the laboratory and justification to have the duplicate test performed, whereas the Smart Alert allowed the provider to bypass the alert at the point of order entry without justification.

RESULTS:

The Hard Stop alert was significantly more effective than the Smart Alert (92.3% vs 42.6%, respectively; P < .0001). The cost savings realized per alert activation was $16.08/alert for the Hard Stop alert vs $3.52/alert for the Smart Alert.

CONCLUSIONS:

Structural and process changes that require laboratory contact and justification for duplicate testing are more effective than interventions that allow providers to bypass alerts without justification at point of computerized physician order entry.

KEYWORDS:

Clinical decision support; Meaningful use; Test utilization

PMID:
25873494
DOI:
10.1309/AJCPJOJ3HKEBD3TU
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center