Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Jun;84(6):1202-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.03.023. Epub 2015 Mar 30.

Triage for suspected acute Pulmonary Embolism: Think before opening Pandora's Box.

Author information

1
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
2
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
3
Sheffield Pulmonary Vascular Disease Unit, M-15, M-Floor, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
4
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA.
5
Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
6
Clinical Research Imaging Centre, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
7
Department of Radiology, UW-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792-3252, USA. Electronic address: mschiebler@uwhealth.org.

Abstract

This is a review of the current strengths and weaknesses of the various imaging modalities available for the diagnosis of suspected non-massive Pulmonary Embolism (PE). Without careful consideration for the clinical presentation, and the timely application of clinical decision support (CDS) methodology, the current overutilization of imaging resources for this disease will continue. For a patient with a low clinical risk profile and a negative D-dimer there is no reason to consider further workup with imaging; as the negative predictive value in this scenario is the same as imaging. While the current efficacy and effectiveness data support the continued use of Computed Tomographic angiography (CTA) as the imaging golden standard for the diagnosis of PE; this test does have the unintended consequences of radiation exposure, possible overdiagnosis and overuse. There is a persistent lack of appreciation on the part of ordering physicians for the effectiveness of the alternatives to CTA (ventilation-perfusion imaging and contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography) in these patients. Careful use of standardized protocols for patient triage and the application of CDS will allow for a better use of imaging resources.

KEYWORDS:

Computed tomographic angiography; Magnetic resonance angiography; Nuclear medicine ventilation–perfusion scans; Patient outcomes; Pulmonary Embolism; Venous thromboembolism

PMID:
25864020
DOI:
10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.03.023
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center