Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Biomed Res. 2015 Apr;29(2):160-8. doi: 10.7555/JBR.28.20130145. Epub 2014 Nov 18.

Efficacy of biofeedback therapy via a mini wireless device on sleep bruxism contrasted with occlusal splint: a pilot study.

Author information

1
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University; Department of General Dentistry, Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China;
2
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University; Department of Stomatology, Jiangsu province Geriatric Institution, Jiangsu Province Official Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China;
3
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Nanjing Medical University; Department of Prosthodontics, Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China;
4
Department of Stomatology, Benq Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210019, China;
5
College of Automation Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210016, China.

Abstract

The putative causes of bruxism are multifactorial and there are no definite measures for bruxism management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of biofeedback therapy on sleep bruxism, compared with occlusal splint. Twenty-four volunteers with sleep bruxism were divided into two groups: the GTB group that were treated with biofeedback therapy (n  = 12) and the GTO group that were treated with occlusal splint (n  = 12). A mini pressure sensor integrated with a monitoring circuit by use of a maxillary biofeedback splint was fabricated. To foster the relaxation of the masticatory muscles and the nervous system, the wireless device received signals from bruxism events and vibrations alerted the bruxer when the threshold was exceeded. Total episodes and average duration of bruxism events during 8 hours of sleep were analyzed with the monitoring program (TRMY1.0). After 6 and 12 weeks, the episodes (P  =  0.001) and duration (P < 0.05) in the GTB group declined dramatically. In contrast, there were no significant differences in the GTO group after the treatment (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the episodes had significant differences between the GTB group and the GTO group after the same period of treatment (P  =  0.000). The results suggest that biofeedback therapy may be an effective and convenient measure for mild bruxers, when compared with occlusal splint therapy. The mini wireless biofeedback method may be of value for the diagnosis and management of bruxism in the future.

KEYWORDS:

biofeedback; miniaturization; occlusal splint; sleep bruxism; vibration; wireless technology

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Journal of Biomedical Research Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center