Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Nutr. 2015 Apr;145(4):736-41. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.195339. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

A high-glycemic index, low-fiber breakfast affects the postprandial plasma glucose, insulin, and ghrelin responses of patients with type 2 diabetes in a randomized clinical trial.

Author information

1
Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
2
Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil mirelajobimazevedo@gmail.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Meals with a low glycemic index (GI) and rich in fiber could be beneficial with regard to postprandial metabolic profile and satiety.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of 4 breakfasts with a different GI and amount of fiber on postprandial plasma glucose, insulin, and appetite in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS:

This randomized 4-intervention crossover trial included 14 patients [7 men; ages 65.8 ± 5.2 y; glycated hemoglobin: 6.6 ± 0.9%; BMI (in kg/m(2)): 27.2 ± 3.1]. Dietary interventions were as follows: breakfasts with a high GI (60.4 ± 0.1%) and high fiber (6.0 ± 0.3 g) (HGI-HF), a high GI (60.9 ± 1.7%) and low fiber (2.5 ± 0.4 g) (HGI-LF), a low GI (37.7 ± 0.1%) and high fiber (6.2 ± 0.3 g) (LGI-HF), and a low GI (39.8 ± 1.3%) and low fiber (2.0 ± 0.1 g) (LGI-LF). Plasma glucose, insulin, and total ghrelin were evaluated postprandially (0-180 min). A visual analog scale was used to assess appetite. Data were analyzed by generalized estimating equations and post hoc least significant difference (LSD) tests. Data are reported as means ± SDs.

RESULTS:

The area under the curve (AUC) [mean (95% CI); P for LSD tests] for plasma glucose (mmol/L × min) was higher after patients consumed the HGI-LF breakfast [9.62 (8.39, 10.84)] than after the LGI-HF breakfast [8.95 (7.71, 10.18)] (P ≤ 0.05). Insulin AUC (μIU/mL × min) after patients consumed the HGI-LF meal [65.72 (38.24, 93.19)] was higher than after the HGI-HF meal [57.24 (32.44, 82.04)] (P ≤ 0.05). The other observed difference was higher insulin AUC after the consumption of the LGI-LF breakfast [61.54 (36.61, 86.48)] compared with the AUC after the LGI-HF breakfast [54.16 (31.43, 76.88)] (P ≤ 0.05). Plasma ghrelin decreased in comparison with baseline only after patients consumed the LGI-HF and LGI-LF breakfasts (P ≤ 0.05). Subjective satiety did not differ between breakfasts.

CONCLUSIONS:

Plasma glucose, insulin, and ghrelin responses were least favorable when patients with type 2 diabetes consumed a breakfast with a high GI and low fiber, which suggests that reducing the GI or increasing the fiber content or both of breakfasts may be a useful strategy to improve the postprandial metabolic profile of these patients. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01410292.

KEYWORDS:

diabetes; dietary fiber; glycemic index; plasma ghrelin; plasma glucose

PMID:
25833777
DOI:
10.3945/jn.114.195339
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center