Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 30;10(3):e0122565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122565. eCollection 2015.

Long-distance interdisciplinarity leads to higher scientific impact.

Author information

1
École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada; Observatoire des sciences et des technologies, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
2
École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
3
Cyberinfrastructure for Network Science Center, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.

Abstract

Scholarly collaborations across disparate scientific disciplines are challenging. Collaborators are likely to have their offices in another building, attend different conferences, and publish in other venues; they might speak a different scientific language and value an alien scientific culture. This paper presents a detailed analysis of success and failure of interdisciplinary papers--as manifested in the citations they receive. For 9.2 million interdisciplinary research papers published between 2000 and 2012 we show that the majority (69.9%) of co-cited interdisciplinary pairs are "win-win" relationships, i.e., papers that cite them have higher citation impact and there are as few as 3.3% "lose-lose" relationships. Papers citing references from subdisciplines positioned far apart (in the conceptual space of the UCSD map of science) attract the highest relative citation counts. The findings support the assumption that interdisciplinary research is more successful and leads to results greater than the sum of its disciplinary parts.

PMID:
25822658
PMCID:
PMC4379013
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0122565
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center