Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Front Pharmacol. 2015 Mar 10;6:45. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00045. eCollection 2015.

Physiological implications of biased signaling at histamine H2 receptors.

Author information

  • 1Laboratorio de Patología y Farmacología Molecular, Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental Buenos Aires, Argentina ; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • 2Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Buenos Aires, Argentina, ; Laboratorio de Farmacología de Receptores, Cátedra de Química Medicinal, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • 3Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Buenos Aires, Argentina, ; Laboratorio de Farmacología de Receptores, Cátedra de Química Medicinal, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires, Argentina ; Instituto de Investigaciones Farmacológicas - Universidad de Buenos Aires - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Abstract

Histamine mediates numerous functions acting through its four receptor subtypes all belonging to the large family of seven transmembrane G-protein coupled receptors. In particular, histamine H2 receptor (H2R) is mainly involved in gastric acid production, becoming a classic pharmacological target to treat Zollinger-Ellison disease and gastric and duodenal ulcers. H2 ligands rank among the most widely prescribed and over the counter-sold drugs in the world. Recent evidence indicate that some H2R ligands display biased agonism, selecting and triggering some, but not all, of the signaling pathways associated to the H2R. The aim of the present work is to study whether famotidine, clinically widespread used ligand acting at H2R, exerts biased signaling. Our findings indicate that while famotidine acts as inverse agonist diminishing cAMP basal levels, it mimics the effects of histamine and the agonist amthamine concerning receptor desensitization and internalization. Moreover, the treatment of HEK293T transfected cells with any of the three ligands lead to a concentration dependent pERK increment. Similarly in AGS gastric epithelial cells, famotidine treatment led to both, the reduction in cAMP levels as well as the increment in ERK phosphorylation, suggesting that this behavior could have pharmacological relevant implications. Based on that, histidine decarboxylase expression was studied by quantitative PCR in AGS cells and its levels were increased by famotidine as well as by histamine and amthamine. In all cases, the positive regulation was impeded by the MEK inhibitor PD98059, indicating that biased signaling toward ERK1/2 pathway is the responsible of such enzyme regulation. These results support that ligand bias is not only a pharmacological curiosity but has physiological and pharmacological implications on cell metabolism.

KEYWORDS:

7TMR; ERK; GPCR internalization; H2R ligands; HDC; biased agonism; pluridimensional efficacy

PMID:
25805997
PMCID:
PMC4354273
DOI:
10.3389/fphar.2015.00045
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Frontiers Media SA Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center