Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Integr Care. 2015 Mar 6;15:e002. eCollection 2015 Jan-Mar.

An instrument for broadened risk assessment in antenatal health care including non-medical issues.

Author information

1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics & Prenatal Medicine, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
2
University of Applied Science, Centre of Expertise Innovations in Care, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
3
Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
4
Department of Social & Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus University College, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
5
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics & Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
6
Department of Public Health, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Growing evidence on the risk contributing role of non-medical factors on pregnancy outcomes urged for a new approach in early antenatal risk selection. The evidence invites to more integration, in particular between the clinical working area and the public health domain. We developed a non-invasive, standardized instrument for comprehensive antenatal risk assessment. The current study presents the application-oriented development of a risk screening instrument for early antenatal detection of risk factors and tailored prevention in an integrated care setting.

METHODS:

A review of published instruments complemented with evidence from cohort studies. Selection and standardization of risk factors associated with small for gestational age, preterm birth, congenital anomalies and perinatal mortality. Risk factors were weighted to obtain a cumulative risk score. Responses were then connected to corresponding care pathways. A cumulative risk threshold was defined, which can be adapted to the population and the availability of preventive facilities. A score above the threshold implies multidisciplinary consultation between caregivers.

RESULTS:

The resulting digital score card consisted of 70 items, subdivided into four non-medical and two medical domains. Weighing of risk factors was based on existing evidence. Pilot-evidence from a cohort of 218 pregnancies in a multi-practice urban setting showed a cut-off of 16 points would imply 20% of all pregnant women to be assessed in a multidisciplinary setting. A total of 28 care pathways were defined.

CONCLUSION:

The resulting score card is a universal risk screening instrument which incorporates recent evidence on non-medical risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes and enables systematic risk management in an integrated antenatal health care setting.

KEYWORDS:

care pathway; integrated care; non-invasive risk screening; perinatal health; pregnancy; risk assessment

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center