Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Apr;15(2):365-76. doi: 10.1177/1533034615572287. Epub 2015 Mar 10.

The Pocketable Electronic Devices in Radiation Oncology (PEDRO) Project: How the Use of Tools in Medical Decision Making is Changing?

Author information

1
Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
2
Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
3
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
4
Medical Physics Department, Ospedale Regionale `U. Parini', AUSL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy.
5
Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
6
Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
7
Radiation Oncology Department, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain.
8
Radiotherapy Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
9
Radiotherapy Department, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown (CCU), Lisbon, Portugal.
10
Radiation Oncology Department, Hopitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
11
Advanced Department, Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera "Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova", IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
12
Radiation Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
13
Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, Morocco.
14
Centre Privé d'oncologie-radiothérapie Elkholti Guelliz, Marrakech, Morocco.
15
Department of oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark.
16
Radiation Oncology, Ospedale Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria, Negrar, Verona, Italy filippo.alongi@sacrocuore.it.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To analyze the impact of mobile electronic devices (MEDs) and apps in the daily clinical activity of young radiation or clinical oncologists in 5 Western European countries (Italy, Germany, Spain, Portugal, and Denmark).

METHODS:

A web-based questionnaire was sent to 462 young (≤40 years) members of the national radiation or clinical oncology associations of the countries involved in the study. The 15 items investigated diffusion of MEDs (smartphones and/or tablets), their impact on daily clinical activity, and the differences perceived by participants along time.

RESULTS:

A total of 386 (83.5%) of the 462 correctly filled questionnaires were statistically evaluated. Up to 65% of respondents declared to use an electronic device during their clinical activity. Conversely, 72% considered low to moderate impact of smartphones/tables on their daily practice. The daily use significantly increased from 2009 to 2012: users reporting a use ≥6 times/d raised from 5% to 39.9%. Professional needs fulfillment was declared by less than 68% of respondents and compliance to apps indications by 66%. Significant differences were seen among the countries, in particular concerning the feeling of usefulness of MEDs in the daily clinical life. The perception of the need of a comprehensive Web site containing a variety of applications (apps) for clinical use significantly differed among countries in 2009, while it was comparable in 2012.

CONCLUSIONS:

This survey showed a large diffusion of MEDs in young professionals working in radiation oncology. Looking at these data, it is important to verify the consistency of information found within apps, in order to avoid potential errors eventually detrimental for patients. "Quality assurance" criteria should be specifically developed for medical apps and a comprehensive Web site gathering all reliable applications and tools might be useful for daily clinical practice.

KEYWORDS:

app; mobile electronic devices; radiotherapy; smartphone; tablet

PMID:
25759425
DOI:
10.1177/1533034615572287
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Atypon
    Loading ...
    Support Center