Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Dec;9(5):64-71. doi: 10.1177/1556264614552421. Epub 2014 Oct 2.

Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists.

Author information

1
VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, The Netherlands j.tijdink@vumc.nl.
2
EOS Magazine, Antwerp, Belgium.
3
VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that scientific misconduct is more common than previously thought. Strong emphasis on scientific productivity may increase the sense of publication pressure. We administered a nationwide survey to Flemish biomedical scientists on whether they had engaged in scientific misconduct and whether they had experienced publication pressure. A total of 315 scientists participated in the survey; 15% of the respondents admitted they had fabricated, falsified, plagiarized, or manipulated data in the past 3 years. Fraud was more common among younger scientists working in a university hospital. Furthermore, 72% rated publication pressure as "too high." Publication pressure was strongly and significantly associated with a composite scientific misconduct severity score.

KEYWORDS:

ethics in publishing; fraud; publication pressure; questionable research practice; scientific misconduct

PMID:
25747691
DOI:
10.1177/1556264614552421
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center