Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Apr;187:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Feb 17.

Correlation between three-dimensional rectosonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: a preliminary study on the first fifty cases.

Author information

  • 1Obstetric and Gynecology Department, Croix-Rousse University Hospital of Lyon, France; Universit√© Claude Bernard Lyon 1, France. Electronic address: caphilip@hotmail.fr.
  • 2Obstetric and Gynecology Department, Croix-Rousse University Hospital of Lyon, France.
  • 3Radiology Department, Croix-Rousse University Hospital of Lyon, 103, Grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, 69004 France.
  • 4Obstetric and Gynecology Department, Croix-Rousse University Hospital of Lyon, France; Universit√© Claude Bernard Lyon 1, France.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) raises a number of diagnostic and therapeutic problems. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the reference technique in endometriosis, is questioned for posterior pelvic lesions, especially in rectosigmoid locations. In this study, we describe a new technique called three-dimensional rectosonography (3D-RSG), which combines standard transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS), 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography and the use of water for rectal contrast. We also assess the correlation between 3D-RSG and MRI in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN:

This study included 50 consecutive women with symptoms suggestive of DIE. After colorectal enema, they underwent a gynecological examination and a 3D TVUS during which 120ml of water was injected in the rectosigmoid to improve the performance of the examination. All patients also underwent an MRI and surgery was offered to the patient if there was discordance between the two procedures.

RESULTS:

Fifty women underwent 3D-RSG between May and November 2012. All procedures were well tolerated by patients. Two examinations (4%) were stopped for technical reasons. Nineteen rectosigmoid nodules were diagnosed in 18 women (36%). Eighteen of these nodules were also identified on MRI, and one (2%) nodule seen on MRI was not diagnosed by 3D-RSG. In 31 examinations (62%), neither technique identified an intestinal lesion. There was a concordance rate of 96% between the two techniques. Using MRI as the reference technique, 3D-RSG had a sensitivity of 0.95, a specificity of 0.97, a positive predictive values of 0.95, and a negative predictive value of 0.97. There was a 30.3 positive likelihood ratio and a 0.05 negative likelihood ratio.

CONCLUSIONS:

3D-RSG seems an interesting new method for diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis and is both feasible and well tolerated. 3D-RSG is highly concordant with MRI in this indication, although further studies are needed to confirm these primary results.

KEYWORDS:

Deeply infiltrating endometriosis; Intestinal endometriosis; Preoperative assessment; Rectosonography; Transvaginal ultrasonography

PMID:
25739054
DOI:
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.006
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center