Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Mar;34(3):415-22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1198.

Reference-based benefit design changes consumers' choices and employers' payments for ambulatory surgery.

Author information

1
James C. Robinson (james.robinson@berkeley.edu) is the Leonard D. Schaeffer Professor of Health Economics and director of the Berkeley Center for Health Technology, School of Public Health, at the University of California, Berkeley.
2
Timothy Brown is an adjunct associate professor of health economics at the School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.
3
Christopher Whaley is a PhD candidate in health services and policy analysis at the University of California, Berkeley.

Abstract

Some employers are using reference-based benefit (RBB) designs, also known as "reference-based pricing," to encourage patients to select lower-price ambulatory surgery centers instead of expensive hospital outpatient departments. This article analyzes the impact of such benefit designs for cataract removal surgery from the period 2009-13, using data on 2,347 surgical patients covered by the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS), in comparison to 14,867 patients enrolled in non-CalPERS Anthem Blue Cross plans, which are not covered by RBB. After adjusting for changes in patient case-mix and other factors, the shift to RBB was associated with an increase in ambulatory surgery center use by 8.6 percentage points compared to trends among Anthem enrollees. Total employer and employee payments per procedure, after adjusting for changes in case-mix severity and market factors, declined by 19.7 percent compared with Anthem enrollees not subject to RBB. Consumer cost-sharing requirements increased for CalPERS patients who continued to use hospital outpatient departments but who were not exempted from RBB because of geographic or clinical factors. Reference-based benefits for cataract surgery saved CalPERS $1.3 million in the two years after implementation.

KEYWORDS:

Business Of Health; Consumer Issues; Health Spending; Managed Care—Consumers < Managed Care; Managed Competition

PMID:
25732491
DOI:
10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1198
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center