Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2015 Feb 22;14:10. doi: 10.1186/s12991-015-0048-0. eCollection 2015.

Computer-assisted cognitive behavior therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a randomized trial on the impact of lay vs. professional coaching.

Author information

1
Center for Telepsychology, 7601 Ganser Way, Madison, WI 53719 USA.
2
Waypoint Health Innovations, 137 E. Wilson Street, Suite 812, Madison, WI 53703 USA.
3
Rogers Memorial Hospital, 34700 Valley Rd, Oconomowoc, WI 53066 USA.
4
255 S. 17th Street, Suite 1111, Philadelphia, PA 19103 USA.
5
Healthcare Technology Systems, 6515 Grand Teton Plaza, Suite 100, Madison, WI 53719 USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The purpose of the study was to examine the impact of computerized cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) self-help treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) (BT Steps) both alone and when supported by coaching from either a lay non-therapist coach or an experienced CBT therapist.

METHODS:

Eighty-seven subjects with clinically significant OCD were recruited through newspaper ads and randomly assigned to receive 12 weeks of treatment with either BT Steps alone (n = 28), BT Steps with non-therapist coaching (n = 28), or BT Steps with CBT therapist coaching (n = 31). Subjects worked on BT Steps at their own pace. Subjects receiving BT Steps alone received a welcome call from the project manager. Subjects randomized to either of the coaching arms received regularly scheduled weekly phone calls for coaching, encouragement, and support. No formal therapy was provided by the coaches; thus, both lay and CBT coaches completed the same tasks.

RESULTS:

All three treatment arms showed a significant reduction in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) scores, with mean (SD) changes of 6.5 (5.7), 7.1 (6.1), and 6.5 (6.1) for the no coaching, lay coaching, and therapist coaching arms, respectively (all p's < .001). These represent effect sizes of 1.16, 1.41, and 1.12, respectively. No significant differences were found between treatment arms on YBOCS change scores, F(2) = 0.10, p = .904, or number of exposures sessions done (F(2) = 0.033, p = .967). When asked which method of therapy (computer vs. clinician) they preferred, 48% said computer, 33% said face-to-face therapy, and 19% had no preference.

CONCLUSIONS:

Results support the use of online self-help for the treatment of moderate OCD. The addition of coaching by either a lay coach or a CBT therapist coach did not significantly improve outcomes.

KEYWORDS:

Cognitive behavior therapy; Computerized self-instruction program; Obsessive compulsive disorder

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center