Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMJ. 2015 Feb 5;350:h217. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h217.

Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Author information

1
Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK zarko@liv.ac.uk.
2
School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
3
Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the effectiveness and safety of prostaglandins used for labour induction.

DESIGN:

Systematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis

DATA SOURCES:

The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Database of Trials (which incorporates the results of a broad generic search for all pregnancy and postpartum trials). Sources included are CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, CINAHL, relevant journals, conference proceedings, and registries of ongoing trials.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES:

Randomised clinical trials of prostaglandin or prostaglandin analogues used for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction versus placebo or no treatment, alternative prostaglandin dose or administration, or a different type of prostaglandin. We included studies recruiting women with a viable fetus, but had no other restrictions relating to indication for labour induction or language of publication. Outcomes assessed were serious neonatal morbidity (trialist defined) or perinatal death; serious maternal morbidity (trialist defined) or death; vaginal delivery not achieved within 24 hours, caesarean section, and uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes.

RESULTS:

280 randomised clinical trials were included (48 068 women) in the review. Maternal and neonatal mortality and serious morbidity were rarely reported and are summarized narratively. Unresolved inconsistency was observed for the hyperstimulation outcome. Relative to placebo, the odds of failing to achieve a vaginal delivery were lowest for vaginal misoprostol (≥50 µg) (odds ratio 0.06 (95% credible interval 0.02 to 0.12)), with a 39% absolute probability of event (95% credible interval 1% to 94%). Compared with placebo, odds of caesarean section were lowest for titrated oral misoprostol solution (<50 µg) (odds ratio 0.65 (0.49 to 0.83)), with an absolute probability of event of 15% (3% to 40%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Low dose(<50 µg) titrated oral misoprostol solution had the lowest probability of caesarean section, whereas vaginal misprostol (≥50 µg) had the highest probability of achieving a vaginal delivery within 24 hours. These findings have important implications for a series of current national and international guidelines for induction of labour and future research in this area.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION:

PROSPERO 2013:CRD42013005116.

PMID:
25656228
PMCID:
PMC4353287
DOI:
10.1136/bmj.h217
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center