Send to

Choose Destination
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Mar;30(3):132-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

Why socio-political borders and boundaries matter in conservation.

Author information

Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. Electronic address:
Department of Food and Resource Economics and Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Copenhagen, Denmark.


Acting to demarcate the spatial limits of decision-making processes, socio-political boundaries are an inevitable part of a human-dominated world. Rarely coincident with ecological boundaries, and thus having no ecological functional role by themselves, they nevertheless impose substantial costs on biodiversity and ecosystem conservation by fragmenting ownership, governance, and management. Where boundaries are in place, a lack of coordination on either side of a boundary affects the efficiency and efficacy of ecosystem management. We suggest four research pathways which will enhance our ability to address the adverse effects of socio-political borders on conservation: (i) scale-matching, (ii) quantification of the mutual economic benefits of conservation across boundaries, (iii) determining transboundary societal values, and (iv) acknowledging the importance of stakeholder behaviour and incentives.


biodiversity; ecosystem services; socio-ecological systems; transnational cooperation

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for White Rose Research Online
Loading ...
Support Center