Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Apr;54:241-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

Visual aggregate analysis of eligibility features of clinical trials.

Author information

1
Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
2
Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
3
Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA. Electronic address: cw2384@cumc.columbia.edu.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To develop a method for profiling the collective populations targeted for recruitment by multiple clinical studies addressing the same medical condition using one eligibility feature each time.

METHODS:

Using a previously published database COMPACT as the backend, we designed a scalable method for visual aggregate analysis of clinical trial eligibility features. This method consists of four modules for eligibility feature frequency analysis, query builder, distribution analysis, and visualization, respectively. This method is capable of analyzing (1) frequently used qualitative and quantitative features for recruiting subjects for a selected medical condition, (2) distribution of study enrollment on consecutive value points or value intervals of each quantitative feature, and (3) distribution of studies on the boundary values, permissible value ranges, and value range widths of each feature. All analysis results were visualized using Google Charts API. Five recruited potential users assessed the usefulness of this method for identifying common patterns in any selected eligibility feature for clinical trial participant selection.

RESULTS:

We implemented this method as a Web-based analytical system called VITTA (Visual Analysis Tool of Clinical Study Target Populations). We illustrated the functionality of VITTA using two sample queries involving quantitative features BMI and HbA1c for conditions "hypertension" and "Type 2 diabetes", respectively. The recruited potential users rated the user-perceived usefulness of VITTA with an average score of 86.4/100.

CONCLUSIONS:

We contributed a novel aggregate analysis method to enable the interrogation of common patterns in quantitative eligibility criteria and the collective target populations of multiple related clinical studies. A larger-scale study is warranted to formally assess the usefulness of VITTA among clinical investigators and sponsors in various therapeutic areas.

KEYWORDS:

Clinical trial; Knowledge management; Patient selection; Selection bias

PMID:
25615940
PMCID:
PMC4408222
DOI:
10.1016/j.jbi.2015.01.005
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center