Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 1;33(7):692-700. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4812. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus cetuximab treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer.

Author information

1
Eric Van Cutsem and Sabine Tejpar, University Hospitals Leuven and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Heinz-Josef Lenz, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Claus-Henning Köhne, Klinikum Oldenburg, Oldenburg; Volker Heinemann, University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich; Ivan Melezínek, Frank Beier, and Christopher Stroh, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; Philippe Rougier, Paris Descartes University, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France; J. Han van Krieken, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; and Fortunato Ciardiello, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy. eric.vancutsem@uzleuven.be.
2
Eric Van Cutsem and Sabine Tejpar, University Hospitals Leuven and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Heinz-Josef Lenz, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Claus-Henning Köhne, Klinikum Oldenburg, Oldenburg; Volker Heinemann, University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich; Ivan Melezínek, Frank Beier, and Christopher Stroh, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; Philippe Rougier, Paris Descartes University, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France; J. Han van Krieken, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; and Fortunato Ciardiello, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

The phase III CRYSTAL study demonstrated that addition of cetuximab to fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response in the first-line treatment of patients with KRAS codon 12/13 (exon 2) wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Outcome was reassessed in subgroups defined by extended RAS mutation testing.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

Existing DNA samples from KRAS exon 2 wild-type tumors from CRYSTAL study patients were reanalyzed for other RAS mutations in four additional KRAS codons (exons 3 and 4) and six NRAS codons (exons 2, 3, and 4) using beads, emulsion, amplification, and magnetics technology. No tissue microdissection was performed. A ≥ 5% mutant allele cutoff was used to call mutations.

RESULTS:

Mutation status was evaluable in 430 (64.6%) of 666 patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type tumors. Other RAS mutations were detected in 63 (14.7%) of 430 patients. In those with RAS wild-type tumors, a significant benefit across all efficacy end points was associated with the addition of cetuximab to FOLFIRI. In patients with other RAS tumor mutations, no difference in efficacy outcomes between treatment groups was seen. The safety profile in RAS subgroups was similar and in line with expectations.

CONCLUSION:

In the first-line treatment of mCRC, patients with RAS wild-type tumors derived a significant benefit from the addition of cetuximab to FOLFIRI; patients with RAS tumor mutations did not. Molecular testing of tumors for all activating RAS mutations is essential before considering anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy, thereby allowing the further tailoring of cetuximab administration to maximize patient benefit.

PMID:
25605843
DOI:
10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4812
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center