Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Neurosurg. 2015 Apr;122(4):976-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.JNS14990. Epub 2015 Jan 2.

"Highly qualified loser"? Harvey Cushing and the Nobel Prize.

Author information

1
University Medical Center, Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Göttingen, Germany; and.

Abstract

Neurosurgery, in particular surgery of the brain, was recognized as one of the most spectacular transgressions of the traditional limits of surgical work. With their audacious, technically demanding, laboratory-based, and highly promising new interventions, prominent neurosurgeons were primary candidates for the Nobel Prize. Accordingly, neurosurgical pioneers such as Victor Horsley and, in particular, Harvey Cushing continued to be nominated for the prize. However, only António Egas Moniz was eventually awarded the prestigious award in 1949 for the introduction of frontal lobotomy, an intervention that would no longer be prize-worthy from today's perspective. Horsley and Cushing, who were arguably the most important proponents of early neurosurgery, remained "highly qualified losers," as such cases have been called. This paper examines the nominations, reviews, and discussions kept in the Nobel Archives to understand the reasons for this remarkable choice. At a more general level, the authors use the example of neurosurgery to explore the mechanisms of scientific recognition and what could be called the enacting of excellence in science and medicine.

KEYWORDS:

Egas Moniz; Harvey Cushing; Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine; Victor Horsley; history of brain surgery

PMID:
25554824
DOI:
10.3171/2014.11.JNS14990
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Sheridan PubFactory
Loading ...
Support Center