Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Brain Stimul. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):240-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Nov 29.

The ACDC pilot trial: targeting the anterior cingulate by double cone coil rTMS for the treatment of depression.

Author information

1
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Germany. Electronic address: peter.kreuzer@medbo.de.
2
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Germany.
3
Unit of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; Brain Research Center Antwerp for Innovative & Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation, Sint-Augustinus Hospital, Belgium.
4
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Kbo-Lech-Mangfall-Klinik Agatharied, Germany.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the dorsolateral-prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with conventional figure-of-8 (=butterfly) coils has been used as an antidepressant therapeutic tool for almost twenty years. Very recently, an innovative rTMS coil, the so-called double cone coil (DC), was introduced allowing the modulation of the anterior cingulate cortex (AC). We investigated safety and therapeutic effectiveness of this stimulation in a naturalistic clinical setting.

METHOD:

Forty-five patients suffering a moderate to severe depressive episode were randomized to receive 15 sessions of either conventional rTMS of the left DLPFC ("butterfly-rTMS"; 10 Hz; 2000 stimuli/day, RMT 110%), mediofrontal double cone coil stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex ("ACDC-rTMS" with equal parameters), or sham-stimulation. The primary outcome was the change in the 21-items Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) from baseline to the end of treatment. Secondary outcome measures were changes over the course of the trial regarding the HAMD, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scales.

RESULTS:

There was a significant group × time interaction effect regarding the primary outcome (F = 3.269; df = 2,37; P = 0.049). Post-hoc t-testing revealed a significant effect for the comparison ACDC vs. butterfly at week 3/end of treatment (T = 2.646; df = 26; P = 0.014). No severe adverse events occurred during the study. ACDC-stimulation was well tolerated by the majority of patients similar like butterfly-rTMS and sham-stimulation.

CONCLUSION:

This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of ACDC-rTMS-stimulation as an add-on-treatment for depression. Its clinical effects warrant further investigation in the future.

KEYWORDS:

Double cone coil; Major depression; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

PMID:
25541389
DOI:
10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.014
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center