Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Brain. 2015 Feb;138(Pt 2):311-9. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu349. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

Significance of neurovascular contact in classical trigeminal neuralgia.

Author information

1
1 Danish Headache Centre, Department of Neurology, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Nordre Ringvej 67, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark lars.bendtsen@regionh.dk.
2
2 Department of Diagnostics, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Nordre Ringvej 57, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark.
3
1 Danish Headache Centre, Department of Neurology, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Nordre Ringvej 67, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark.

Abstract

Neurovascular contact is considered a frequent cause of classical trigeminal neuralgia and microvascular decompression with transposition of a blood vessel is preferred over other surgical options in medically refractory patients with classical trigeminal neuralgia. However, the prevalence of neurovascular contact has not been investigated in a representative cohort of patients with classical trigeminal neuralgia based in a neurological setting and using high-quality neuroimaging and blinded evaluation. We aimed to investigate whether presence and degree of neurovascular contact are correlated to pain side in classical trigeminal neuralgia. Consecutive classical trigeminal neuralgia patients with unilateral symptoms were referred to 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging and included in a cross-sectional study. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were evaluated blindly and graded according to presence and degree of neurovascular contact. Severe neurovascular contact was defined as displacement or atrophy of the trigeminal nerve. A total of 135 patients with classical trigeminal neuralgia were included. Average age of disease onset was 53.0 years (95% confidence interval mean 40.5-55.5) and current age was 60.1 years (95% % confidence interval mean 57.5-62.7). Eighty-two (61%, 95% confidence interval 52-69%) patients were female. Neurovascular contact was prevalent both on the symptomatic and asymptomatic side [89% versus 78%, P = 0.014, odds ratio = 2.4 (1.2-4.8), P = 0.017], while severe neurovascular contact was highly prevalent on the symptomatic compared to the asymptomatic side [53% versus 13%, P < 0.001, odds ratio = 11.6 (4.7-28.9), P < 0.001]. Severe neurovascular contact was caused by arteries in 98%. We conclude that neurovascular contact causing displacement or atrophy of the trigeminal nerve is highly associated with the symptomatic side in classical trigeminal neuralgia as opposed to neurovascular contact in general. Our findings demonstrate that severe neurovascular contact is involved in the aetiology of classical trigeminal neuralgia and that it is caused by arteries located in the root entry zone.

KEYWORDS:

neurovascular compression; neurovascular contact; trigeminal neuralgia

PMID:
25541189
DOI:
10.1093/brain/awu349
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center